↓ Skip to main content

Endocrinological Roles for Testosterone in Resistance Exercise Responses and Adaptations

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
54 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
7 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Endocrinological Roles for Testosterone in Resistance Exercise Responses and Adaptations
Published in
Sports Medicine, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40279-017-0698-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

David R. Hooper, William J. Kraemer, Brian C. Focht, Jeff S. Volek, William H. DuPont, Lydia K. Caldwell, Carl M. Maresh

Abstract

Chronic increases in testosterone levels can significantly increase hypertrophy and strength, as has been demonstrated by pharmacological intervention. However, decreases in basal testosterone levels can have the opposite result, as has been seen in hypogonadal populations. Because of these profound effects on hypertrophy and strength, testosterone has often been studied in conjunction with resistance exercise to examine whether the endocrine system plays a role in adaptations to the stimulus. Whereas some studies have demonstrated a chronic increase in basal testosterone, others have failed to find an adaptation to regular resistance exercise. However, improvements in strength and hypertrophy appear to be possible regardless of the presence of this adaptation. Testosterone has also been shown to acutely rise immediately following an acute resistance exercise bout. While this substantial mobilization of testosterone is brief, its effects are seen for several hours through the upregulation of the androgen receptor. The role of this acute response at present is unknown, but further study of the non-genomic action and possible intracrinological processes is warranted. This response does not seem to be necessary for resistance training adaptations to occur either, but whether this response optimizes such adaptations has not yet been determined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 16%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 41 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 56 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 46 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#850,657
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#769
of 2,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,606
of 324,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#19
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.