↓ Skip to main content

Altruistic cooperation during foraging by the Ache, and the evolved human predisposition to cooperate

Overview of attention for article published in Human Nature, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
36 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
Title
Altruistic cooperation during foraging by the Ache, and the evolved human predisposition to cooperate
Published in
Human Nature, March 2002
DOI 10.1007/s12110-002-1016-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim Hill

Abstract

This paper presents quantitative data on altruistic cooperation during food acquisition by Ache foragers. Cooperative activities are defined as those that entail a cost of time and energy to the donor but primarily lead to an increase in the foraging success of the recipient. Data show that Ache men and women spend about 10% of all foraging time engaged in altruistic cooperation on average, and that on some days they may spend more than 50% of their foraging time in such activities. The most time-consuming cooperative activity for both sexes is helping during the pursuit of game animals, a pattern that is probably linked to the widespread sharing of game by Ache foragers. Cooperative food acquisition and subsequent food redistribution in hunter-gatherer societies are critical behaviors that probably helped shape universal, evolved, cooperative tendencies that are well illustrated in modern experimental economics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 191 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 27%
Researcher 41 20%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Master 20 10%
Professor 12 6%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 19 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 24%
Psychology 39 19%
Social Sciences 36 17%
Arts and Humanities 16 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 5%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 30 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2022.
All research outputs
#986,016
of 25,848,323 outputs
Outputs from Human Nature
#101
of 551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#728
of 50,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Nature
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,323 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.