| Title |
Physical activity and endometrial cancer in a population-based case–control study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-010-9689-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah Arem, Melinda L. Irwin, Yang Zhou, Lingeng Lu, Harvey Risch, Herbert Yu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 32% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2012.
All research outputs
#5,166,020
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#610
of 2,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,237
of 188,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.