| Title |
Airborne test of laser pump-and-probe technique for assessment of phytoplankton photochemical characteristics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Photosynthesis Research, October 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1010764420934 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander M. Chekalyuk, Frank E. Hoge, Charles W. Wright, Robert N. Swift, James K. Yungel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 71% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Photosynthesis Research
#100
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,371
of 38,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Photosynthesis Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them