Title |
Evaluation of nutria (Myocastor coypus) detection methods in Maryland, USA
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Invasions, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10530-016-1312-1 |
Authors |
Margaret A. Pepper, Valentine Herrmann, James E. Hines, James D. Nichols, Stephen R. Kendrot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 22% |
Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
Researcher | 6 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 9 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 19% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2017.
All research outputs
#12,909,130
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,500
of 2,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,737
of 312,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#37
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.