↓ Skip to main content

Allocation, Lehrer models, and the consensus of probabilities

Overview of attention for article published in Theory and Decision, June 1982
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Allocation, Lehrer models, and the consensus of probabilities
Published in
Theory and Decision, June 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf00133978
Authors

Carl Wagner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 4 27%
Social Sciences 3 20%
Philosophy 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Theory and Decision
#64
of 246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,973
of 7,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory and Decision
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them