↓ Skip to main content

Handwriting evaluation for developmental dysgraphia: Process versus product

Overview of attention for article published in Reading and Writing, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Handwriting evaluation for developmental dysgraphia: Process versus product
Published in
Reading and Writing, July 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:read.0000044596.91833.55
Authors

Sara Rosenblum, Patrice L. Weiss, Shula Parush

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 140 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 20%
Social Sciences 22 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 9%
Computer Science 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 32 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Reading and Writing
#271
of 836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,967
of 59,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reading and Writing
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.