| Title |
Selection of cereals for weed suppression in organic agriculture: a method based on cultivar sensitivity to weed growth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Euphytica, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10681-008-9710-9 |
| Authors |
Stephen Hoad, Cairistiona Topp, Ken Davies |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 41% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 68% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#326
of 1,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,623
of 82,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,138 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.