| Title |
Individual differences, rereading, and self-explanation: Concurrent processing and cue validity as constraints on metacomprehension accuracy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Memory & Cognition, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.3758/mc.36.1.93 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas D. Griffin, Jennifer Wiley, Keith W. Thiede |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 65 | 51% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 13% |
| Linguistics | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#493
of 1,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,988
of 156,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.