↓ Skip to main content

Designing idea processors for document composition

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, March 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Designing idea processors for document composition
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, March 1986
DOI 10.3758/bf03201010
Authors

Ronald T. Kellogg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Lecturer 2 9%
Other 9 39%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 22%
Linguistics 4 17%
Psychology 3 13%
Computer Science 2 9%
Arts and Humanities 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#740
of 2,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,217
of 10,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them