| Title |
A comparison of slip, disjoining pressure, and interface formation models for contact line motion through asymptotic analysis of thin two-dimensional droplet spreading
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Engineering Mathematics, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10665-014-9702-9 |
| Authors |
David N. Sibley, Andreas Nold, Nikos Savva, Serafim Kalliadasis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 2 | 4% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 40% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 19 | 37% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 21% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2015.
All research outputs
#14,756,074
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Engineering Mathematics
#70
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,395
of 235,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Engineering Mathematics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them