↓ Skip to main content

Central Nervous System Injuries in Sport and Recreation

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Central Nervous System Injuries in Sport and Recreation
Published in
Sports Medicine, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200535080-00003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cory Toth, Stephen McNeil, Thomas Feasby

Abstract

Many sports have been associated with a variety of neurological injuries affecting the central nervous system (CNS), with some injuries specific to that sport. A systematic review of sport-specific CNS injuries has not been attempted previously, and could assist in the understanding of morbidity and mortality associated with particular sporting activities, either professional or amateur. A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed (1965-2003) examining all known sports and a range of possible CNS injuries attributable to that sport. Numerous sporting activities (45) have associated CNS injuries as reported within the literature. The sports most commonly associated with CNS injuries are: football, boxing, hockey, use of a trampoline, and various winter activities. A number of sporting activities are associated with unique CNS injuries or injury-related diseases such as heat stroke in auto racing, vertebral artery dissection in the martial arts, and dementia pugilistica in boxing. Neurological injuries of the CNS due to sport comprise a wide collection of maladies that are important for the neurologist, neurosurgeon, orthopaedic surgeon, physiatrist, sports medicine doctor, athletic trainer and general physician to recognise.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 122 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Researcher 12 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 31 24%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 29%
Sports and Recreations 25 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Engineering 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2015.
All research outputs
#1,981,158
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,392
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,990
of 189,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#193
of 761 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 761 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.