↓ Skip to main content

Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Science Education and Technology, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
469 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
451 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World
Published in
Journal of Science Education and Technology, March 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1009421303064
Authors

Uri Wilensky, Mitchel Resnick

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 451 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 23 5%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 413 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 111 25%
Researcher 62 14%
Student > Master 57 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 9%
Professor 35 8%
Other 88 20%
Unknown 57 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 160 35%
Computer Science 44 10%
Psychology 30 7%
Engineering 18 4%
Environmental Science 17 4%
Other 112 25%
Unknown 70 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Science Education and Technology
#191
of 624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,698
of 35,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Science Education and Technology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them