↓ Skip to main content

Extrinsic versus intrinsic factors in the decline and extinction of Australian marsupials

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
216 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extrinsic versus intrinsic factors in the decline and extinction of Australian marsupials
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, September 2003
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2003.2447
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana O. Fisher, Simon P. Blomberg, Ian P. F. Owens

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 12 3%
Australia 8 2%
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 5 1%
France 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 321 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 87 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 21%
Student > Master 42 11%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Professor 17 5%
Other 68 18%
Unknown 50 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 203 55%
Environmental Science 68 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 1%
Other 16 4%
Unknown 60 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#7,884
of 11,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,605
of 55,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#35
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.