| Title |
Morphological studies of the Nymphaeaceae. VII. The floral biology of Nuphar Lutea subsp. macrophylla
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brittonia, January 1977
|
| DOI | 10.2307/2805746 |
| Authors |
Edward L. Schneider, Lesa A. Moore |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Serbia | 2 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Librarian | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 22% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Brittonia
#33
of 608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,215
of 23,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brittonia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 608 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them