↓ Skip to main content

The case–combined-control design was efficient in detecting gene–environment interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The case–combined-control design was efficient in detecting gene–environment interactions
Published in
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, July 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.11.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Andrieu, A.M. Goldstein

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 13%
Unknown 13 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 5 33%
Professor 3 20%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 47%
Mathematics 3 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2006.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#2,687
of 4,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,966
of 59,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.