You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Testing the use of microfossils to reconstruct great earthquakes at Cascadia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geology, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1130/g34544.1 |
| Authors |
S.E. Engelhart, B.P. Horton, A.R. Nelson, A.D. Hawkes, R.C. Witter, K. Wang, P.-L. Wang, C.H. Vane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 25 | 63% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2013.
All research outputs
#2,247,798
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Geology
#1,580
of 4,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,105
of 219,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geology
#34
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.