| Title |
Identification of an HD patient with a (CAG)180 repeat expansion and the propagation of highly expanded CAG repeats in lambda phage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Genetics, April 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004390050432 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kirupa Sathasivam, Iheoma Amaechi, Laura Mangiarini, G. Bates |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 42% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#515
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,431
of 29,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.