| Title |
The ammonia freeze explosion (AFEX) process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, March 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02922589 |
| Authors |
Mark T. Holtzapple, Jae-Hoon Jun, Ganesh Ashok, Srinivas L. Patibandla, Bruce E. Dale |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 19% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 21% |
| Engineering | 18 | 17% |
| Chemical Engineering | 10 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,300,930
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#81
of 2,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#960
of 17,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,517 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.