↓ Skip to main content

Biodiversity Conservation in a Changing Climate: A Review of Threats and Implications for Conservation Planning in Myanmar

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 1,644)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
Title
Biodiversity Conservation in a Changing Climate: A Review of Threats and Implications for Conservation Planning in Myanmar
Published in
Ambio, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13280-013-0423-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madhu Rao, Saw Htun, Steven G. Platt, Robert Tizard, Colin Poole, Than Myint, James E. M. Watson

Abstract

High levels of species richness and endemism make Myanmar a regional priority for conservation. However, decades of economic and political sanctions have resulted in low conservation investment to effectively tackle threats to biodiversity. Recent sweeping political reforms have placed Myanmar on the fast track to economic development-the expectation is increased economic investments focused on the exploitation of the country's rich, and relatively intact, natural resources. Within a context of weak regulatory capacity and inadequate environmental safeguards, rapid economic development is likely to have far-reaching negative implications for already threatened biodiversity and natural-resource-dependent human communities. Climate change will further exacerbate prevailing threats given Myanmar's high exposure and vulnerability. The aim of this review is to examine the implications of increased economic growth and a changing climate within the larger context of biodiversity conservation in Myanmar. We summarize conservation challenges, assess direct climatological impacts on biodiversity and conclude with recommendations for long-term adaptation approaches for biodiversity conservation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Benin 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 224 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 19%
Researcher 43 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Other 14 6%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 77 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 25%
Social Sciences 13 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 52 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2022.
All research outputs
#482,633
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#48
of 1,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,824
of 198,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.