Title |
Adolescence
|
---|---|
Published in |
Endocrine, January 2002
|
DOI | 10.1385/endo:17:1:43 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Connie M. Weaver |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Qatar | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Researcher | 4 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 13 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,281,982
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Endocrine
#59
of 1,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,763
of 134,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endocrine
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.