↓ Skip to main content

Local movement in herbivorous insects: applying a passive diffusion model to mark-recapture field experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, March 1983
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
208 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Local movement in herbivorous insects: applying a passive diffusion model to mark-recapture field experiments
Published in
Oecologia, March 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf00377175
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. M. Kareiva

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
Brazil 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 115 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 19%
Professor 16 12%
Student > Master 15 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 64 49%
Environmental Science 27 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Mathematics 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 18 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2002.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,680
of 4,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,095
of 8,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.