↓ Skip to main content

Characteristics and rates of disciplinary findings amongst anesthesiologists by professional colleges in Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Characteristics and rates of disciplinary findings amongst anesthesiologists by professional colleges in Canada
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12630-013-0006-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Asim Alam, James Khan, Jessica Liu, Jason Klemensberg, Joshua Griesman, Chaim M. Bell

Abstract

Previous studies discussing the risk of medical misconduct amongst anesthesiologists differ in their conclusions. In Canada, there is a paucity of data regarding demographic information, disciplinary findings, and penalties received by anesthesiologists. The aim of this study was to identify potential characteristics for discipline within the specialty of anesthesiology by ascertaining disciplinary findings and types of penalties received by anesthesiologists and comparing these with cases of disciplinary action against other Canadian physicians.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Other 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2,319
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,634
of 210,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.