↓ Skip to main content

Mirror responses in a Japanese macaque troop (Arashiyama West)

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, July 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Mirror responses in a Japanese macaque troop (Arashiyama West)
Published in
Primates, July 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf02382404
Authors

Meredith M. Platt, Robert L. Thompson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 33%
Psychology 4 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1998.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#471
of 1,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,697
of 9,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.