↓ Skip to main content

Transformed Drosophila Cells Evade Diet-Mediated Insulin Resistance through Wingless Signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transformed Drosophila Cells Evade Diet-Mediated Insulin Resistance through Wingless Signaling
Published in
Cell, August 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susumu Hirabayashi, Thomas J. Baranski, Ross L. Cagan

Abstract

The risk of specific cancers increases in patients with metabolic dysfunction, including obesity and diabetes. Here, we use Drosophila as a model to explore the effects of diet on tumor progression. Feeding Drosophila a diet high in carbohydrates was previously demonstrated to direct metabolic dysfunction, including hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and insulin resistance. We demonstrate that high dietary sugar also converts Ras/Src-transformed tissue from localized growths to aggressive tumors with emergent metastases. Whereas most tissues displayed insulin resistance, Ras/Src tumors retained insulin pathway sensitivity, increased the ability to import glucose, and resisted apoptosis. High dietary sugar increased canonical Wingless/Wnt pathway activity, which upregulated insulin receptor gene expression to promote insulin sensitivity. The result is a feed-forward circuit that amplified diet-mediated malignant phenotypes within Ras/Src-transformed tumors. By targeting multiple steps in this circuit with rationally applied drug combinations, we demonstrate the potential of combinatorial drug intervention to treat diet-enhanced malignant tumors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 242 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 20%
Student > Master 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 6%
Other 47 19%
Unknown 37 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Chemistry 3 1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 42 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#754,767
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#3,226
of 17,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,969
of 210,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#40
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.