↓ Skip to main content

Anandamide oxidative metabolism-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis

Overview of attention for article published in Apoptosis, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Anandamide oxidative metabolism-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis
Published in
Apoptosis, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10495-017-1356-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Almada, B. M. Fonseca, C. Amaral, M. Diniz-da-Costa, G. Correia-da-Silva, N. Teixeira

Abstract

The Endocannabinoid System (ECS) has been recognized as a crucial player in human reproduction. Changes in the levels of anandamide (AEA), the main endocannabinoid (eCB), negatively affect reproductive events, such as implantation, decidualization and placentation. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is a major enzyme expressed in the endometrium and its involvement in female reproductive system has evolved over the last few years. Currently, COX-2 oxidative metabolism is emerging as a key mediator of AEA-induced actions. In this study, we aimed to disclose the mechanisms underlying the effects of AEA in human endometrial stromal cell fate, using a human-derived endometrial cell line (St-T1b). We found that AEA has an anti-proliferative activity through a direct effect on cell cycle progression by inducing G2/M arrest. Moreover, high levels of AEA increased COX-2 activity, triggering apoptotic cell death, with loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, induction of caspase -9 and -3/-7 activities, and cleavage of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). In addition, the involvement of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress was verified. These effects were prevented by pre-incubation with a selective COX-2 inhibitor. Therefore, we hypothesize that, in response to altered levels of this eCB, COX-2 oxidative metabolism of AEA may deregulate endometrial cell turnover and, consequently, interfere with cellular events crucial for implantation and decidualization, with a negative impact on human fertility.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,406,219
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Apoptosis
#634
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,450
of 310,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Apoptosis
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.