You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An Exploratory Study of Problem Gambling on Casino Versus Non-casino Electronic Gaming Machines
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, December 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11469-010-9306-1 |
Authors |
Dave Clarke, Justin Pulford, Maria Bellringer, Max Abbott, David C. Hodgins |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 6 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,787,559
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#152
of 1,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,121
of 192,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them