↓ Skip to main content

Multiple Myeloma and Work in Agriculture: Results of a Case-Control Study in Forlì, Italy

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, May 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Multiple Myeloma and Work in Agriculture: Results of a Case-Control Study in Forlì, Italy
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, May 1998
DOI 10.1023/a:1008821119851
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oriana Nanni, Fabio Falcini, Eva Buiatti, Lauro Bucchi, Monica Naldoni, Patrizia Serra, Emanuela Scarpi, Luca Saragoni, Dino Amadori

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Researcher 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 24%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2003.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#996
of 2,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,692
of 33,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.