↓ Skip to main content

The Reproducibility of Blood Acid Base Responses in Male Collegiate Athletes Following Individualised Doses of Sodium Bicarbonate: A Randomised Controlled Crossover Study

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
The Reproducibility of Blood Acid Base Responses in Male Collegiate Athletes Following Individualised Doses of Sodium Bicarbonate: A Randomised Controlled Crossover Study
Published in
Sports Medicine, February 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40279-017-0699-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lewis A. Gough, Sanjoy K. Deb, Andy S. Sparks, Lars R. McNaughton

Abstract

Current evidence suggests sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) should be ingested based upon the individualised alkalotic peak of either blood pH or bicarbonate (HCO3(-)) because of large inter-individual variations (10-180 min). If such a strategy is to be practical, the blood analyte response needs to be reproducible. This study aimed to evaluate the degree of reproducibility of both time to peak (TTP) and absolute change in blood pH, HCO3(-) and sodium (Na(+)) following acute NaHCO3 ingestion. Male participants (n = 15) with backgrounds in rugby, football or sprinting completed six randomised treatments entailing ingestion of two doses of 0.2 g·kg(-1) body mass (BM) NaHCO3 (SBC2a and b), two doses of 0.3 g·kg(-1) BM NaHCO3 (SBC3a and b) or two control treatments (CON1a and b) on separate days. Blood analysis included pH, HCO3(-) and Na(+) prior to and at regular time points following NaHCO3 ingestion over a 3-h period. HCO3(-) displayed greater reproducibility than pH in intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis for both TTP (HCO3(-) SBC2 r = 0.77, P = 0.003; SBC3 r = 0.94, P < 0.001; pH SBC2 r = 0.62, P = 0.044; SBC3 r = 0.71, P = 0.016) and absolute change (HCO3(-) SBC2 r = 0.89, P < 0.001; SBC3 r = 0.76, P = 0.008; pH SBC2 r = 0.84, P = 0.001; SBC3 r = 0.62, P = 0.041). Our results indicate that both TTP and absolute change in HCO3(-) is more reliable than pH. As such, these data provide support for an individualised NaHCO3 ingestion strategy to consistently elicit peak alkalosis before exercise. Future work should utilise an individualised NaHCO3 ingestion strategy based on HCO3(-) responses and evaluate effects on exercise performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 92 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 27 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 30 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 30 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,177,905
of 24,535,155 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,818
of 2,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,764
of 315,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#44
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,535,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 54.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.