↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Self-guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Psychiatry, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
127 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
587 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
700 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of Self-guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Data
Published in
JAMA Psychiatry, April 2017
DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eirini Karyotaki, Heleen Riper, Jos Twisk, Adriaan Hoogendoorn, Annet Kleiboer, Adriana Mira, Andrew Mackinnon, Björn Meyer, Cristina Botella, Elizabeth Littlewood, Gerhard Andersson, Helen Christensen, Jan P. Klein, Johanna Schröder, Juana Bretón-López, Justine Scheider, Kathy Griffiths, Louise Farrer, Marcus J. H. Huibers, Rachel Phillips, Simon Gilbody, Steffen Moritz, Thomas Berger, Victor Pop, Viola Spek, Pim Cuijpers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 700 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 697 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 13%
Researcher 89 13%
Student > Master 88 13%
Student > Bachelor 86 12%
Other 29 4%
Other 106 15%
Unknown 212 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 241 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 64 9%
Social Sciences 38 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 3%
Neuroscience 15 2%
Other 75 11%
Unknown 243 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 235. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#163,227
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Psychiatry
#430
of 5,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,492
of 328,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Psychiatry
#16
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 70.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.