↓ Skip to main content

Adolescent Girls’ and Boys’ Science Peer Relationships and Perceptions of the Possible Self as Scientist

Overview of attention for article published in Sex Roles, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Adolescent Girls’ and Boys’ Science Peer Relationships and Perceptions of the Possible Self as Scientist
Published in
Sex Roles, January 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11199-005-1189-4
Authors

Jayne E. Stake, Shannon D. Nickens

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 7%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 98 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 22%
Student > Master 19 18%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 26 24%
Unknown 7 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 42 39%
Psychology 24 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Environmental Science 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 8 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2017.
All research outputs
#5,923,711
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#903
of 2,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,447
of 140,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.