| Title |
An integrative OSCE methodology for enhancing the traditional OSCE program at Taipei medical university hospital - a feasibility study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-13-102 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Che-Wei Lin, Daniel L Clinciu, Mark H Swartz, Chien-Chih Wu, Gi-Shih Lien, Cho-Yu Chan, Fei-Peng Lee, Yu-Chuan Li |
| Abstract |
Continuous development and use of new technologies and methodologies are key features in improving the learning, performance, and skills of medical students and students of all health care professions. Although significant improvements in teaching methodologies have been made in all areas of medicine and health care, studies reveal that students in many areas of health care taking an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) express difficulties. Thus, this study was planned as a feasibility study to assess the educational effectiveness of an integrated objective structured clinical examination (iOSCE) using both standardized patients and virtual patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 29% |
| Unknown | 31 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2013.
All research outputs
#15,274,954
of 22,715,151 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,257
of 3,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,294
of 197,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#30
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,715,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.