| Title |
Date Palm Sap Collection: Exploring Opportunities to Prevent Nipah Transmission
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EcoHealth, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10393-010-0320-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nazmun Nahar, Rebeca Sultana, Emily S. Gurley, M. Jahangir Hossain, Stephen P. Luby |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#372
of 710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,044
of 95,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.