You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A new and rapid method for epistaxis treatment using injectable form of tranexamic acid topically: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Emergency Medicine, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.06.043 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Reza Zahed, Payman Moharamzadeh, Saeid AlizadehArasi, Asghar Ghasemi, Morteza Saeedi |
| Abstract |
Epistaxis is a common problem in the emergency department (ED). Sixty percent of people experience it at least once in their life. There are different kinds of treatment for epistaxis. This study intended to evaluate the topical use of injectable form of tranexamic acid vs anterior nasal packing with pledgets coated with tetracycline ointment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 30% |
| Australia | 11 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 5% |
| Spain | 5 | 4% |
| Chile | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Ireland | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 52 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 82 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 36 | 27% |
| Scientists | 13 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 14% |
| Researcher | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 23% |
| Unknown | 32 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 117 | 64% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 146. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#287,365
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Emergency Medicine
#52
of 6,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,957
of 210,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Emergency Medicine
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.