| Title |
Gender and the GeoWeb: divisions in the production of user-generated cartographic information
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
GeoJournal, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10708-013-9492-z |
| Authors |
Monica Stephens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| Belize | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Nepal | 1 | 4% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 74% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Serbia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 22% |
| Researcher | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 48 | 29% |
| Computer Science | 23 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2022.
All research outputs
#351,208
of 25,386,384 outputs
Outputs from GeoJournal
#4
of 831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,460
of 209,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GeoJournal
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,384 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them