| Title |
Metabolic studies in congenital vitamin D deficiency rickets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, January 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02752183 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Teotia, S. P. S. Teotia, M. Nath |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#284
of 1,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,227
of 76,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them