↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D Status During Puberty in French Healthy Male Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, September 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D Status During Puberty in French Healthy Male Adolescents
Published in
Osteoporosis International, September 1999
DOI 10.1007/s001980050219
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Guillemant, P. Taupin, H. T. Le, N. Taright, A. Allemandou, G. Pérès, S. Guillemant

Abstract

The vitamin D status was determined on one to four occasions either after summer (September-October) or after winter (March-April) in 175 male adolescents (13-17 years), resulting in 394 measurements of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH). The subjects lived in a rural area to the north of Paris (49 degrees N). After summer the 25(OH)D concentration was 58.5 +/- 18.0 nmol/l (mean +/- SD), while after winter it had fallen to 20.6 +/-6.0 nmol/l (p = 0.0001). Meanwhile the iPTH concentration was 2.76 +/- 0.97 pmol/l (mean +/- SD) after summer and increased to 4.20 +/- 1.21 pmol/l after winter (p = 0. 0001). All the results were pooled and a nonlinear population model with random parameters was used to describe the relationship between serum iPTH and 25(OH)D. When the concentration of 25(OH)D was higher than 83 nmol/l, an iPTH mean 'plateau' level at 2.48 pmol/l was reached. When 25(OH)D concentrations fell below 83 nmol/l, the increase in iPTH concentration accelerates, and when the mean 25(OH)D concentration was equal to or lower than 10 nmol/l the mean iPTH level (4.97 pmol/l) was twice as high as the 'plateau' value.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 25%
Other 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,381
of 3,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,105
of 34,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.