↓ Skip to main content

Bodily changes among people living with physical impairments and chronic illnesses: biographical disruption or normal illness?

Overview of attention for article published in Sociology of Health & Illness, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bodily changes among people living with physical impairments and chronic illnesses: biographical disruption or normal illness?
Published in
Sociology of Health & Illness, February 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01460.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annika Taghizadeh Larsson, Eva Jeppsson Grassman

Abstract

This article focuses on individuals who are growing old with chronic illnesses and early onset impairments. Their experience of illness complications, bodily and functional losses is similar to what Bury has referred to as a biographical disruption. However, whereas Bury argues that a chronic illness amounts to a critical situation for the individual, partly due to its unexpected nature, this does not apply to the participants in our two studies. A second difference concerns Bury's implicit suggestion that the disruption is a single event that is characteristic of the early stage of a chronic illness. Repeated disruptions seemed to shape the lives of several of those interviewed. At the same time, this article challenges studies which suggest that the notion of disruption is less relevant to people in later life and to those who have experienced difficult lives, and also questions the argument that continuity rather than change characterises the lives of people who have had chronic conditions since their early years. In its approach, the article responds to Williams' request for studies in the sociology of chronic illness that extend the predominant biographical focus on the middle years of life to both ends of the life course.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 4%
Canada 2 2%
Argentina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 93 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 33%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Psychology 12 12%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,208,781
of 24,844,992 outputs
Outputs from Sociology of Health & Illness
#1,883
of 2,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,697
of 261,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociology of Health & Illness
#19
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,844,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.