↓ Skip to main content

Electronic and resonance effects on the lonization of structural analogues of efavirenz

Overview of attention for article published in The AAPS Journal, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Electronic and resonance effects on the lonization of structural analogues of efavirenz
Published in
The AAPS Journal, July 2015
DOI 10.1208/ps030428
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shelley R. Rabel, Sophie Sun, Michael B. Maurin, Mona Patel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2013.
All research outputs
#6,352,869
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#360
of 1,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,882
of 277,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#10
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.