↓ Skip to main content

What’s in a name revisited: should osteoporosis and sarcopenia be considered components of “dysmobility syndrome?”

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
Title
What’s in a name revisited: should osteoporosis and sarcopenia be considered components of “dysmobility syndrome?”
Published in
Osteoporosis International, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00198-013-2427-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Binkley, D. Krueger, B. Buehring

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Lithuania 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor 7 7%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2013.
All research outputs
#20,567,353
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#2,824
of 3,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,770
of 214,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#22
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.