↓ Skip to main content

Adolescent depression: Why more girls?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, April 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
544 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Adolescent depression: Why more girls?
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, April 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf01537611
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne C. Petersen, Pamela A. Sarigiani, Robert E. Kennedy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 174 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 73 40%
Social Sciences 24 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 40 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#1,014
of 1,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,233
of 17,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.