↓ Skip to main content

The causes and consequences of deforestation among the prehistoric Maya

Overview of attention for article published in Human Ecology, December 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The causes and consequences of deforestation among the prehistoric Maya
Published in
Human Ecology, December 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf00891649
Authors

Elliot M. Abrams, David J. Rue

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Mexico 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 57 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Student > Master 11 18%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 23 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Environmental Science 9 15%
Arts and Humanities 6 10%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 7 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1993.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#334
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,698
of 55,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 55,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them