↓ Skip to main content

Uses of tropical deciduous forest species by the Yucatecan Maya

Overview of attention for article published in Agroforestry Systems, May 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Uses of tropical deciduous forest species by the Yucatecan Maya
Published in
Agroforestry Systems, May 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00045730
Authors

V. Rico-Gray, A. Chemás, S. Mandujano

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 4%
Mexico 3 3%
Peru 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Unknown 82 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 27 30%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 44%
Environmental Science 17 19%
Unspecified 4 4%
Chemistry 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1993.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Agroforestry Systems
#240
of 979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,014
of 17,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agroforestry Systems
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 979 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them