↓ Skip to main content

Use of passages across a canal by wild mammals and related mortality

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Wildlife Research, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Use of passages across a canal by wild mammals and related mortality
Published in
European Journal of Wildlife Research, May 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10344-004-0045-0
Authors

Salvador Peris, Javier Morales

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 6 3%
Portugal 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
India 3 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 168 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 50 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 21%
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Other 13 7%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 12 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 117 61%
Environmental Science 43 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 19 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,521,897
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#358
of 911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,816
of 58,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them