You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are conservation biologists working too hard?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.029 |
| Authors |
Ahimsa Campos-Arceiz, Lian Pin Koh, Richard B. Primack |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 203 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 11% |
| France | 8 | 4% |
| Australia | 8 | 4% |
| Spain | 7 | 3% |
| Ireland | 7 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 5 | 2% |
| Finland | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 72 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 108 | 53% |
| Scientists | 80 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 13 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| Spain | 5 | 1% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Unknown | 321 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 98 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 7% |
| Professor | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 87 | 23% |
| Unknown | 28 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 208 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 84 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Unknown | 42 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 212. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#188,516
of 25,880,948 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#113
of 6,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,281
of 221,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.