| Title |
A user guide to theBrassica60K Illumina Infinium™ SNP genotyping array
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00122-016-2849-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annaliese S. Mason, Erin E. Higgins, Rod J. Snowdon, Jacqueline Batley, Anna Stein, Christian Werner, Isobel A. P. Parkin |
| Abstract |
The Brassica napus 60K Illumina Infinium™ SNP array has had huge international uptake in the rapeseed community due to the revolutionary speed of acquisition and ease of analysis of this high-throughput genotyping data, particularly when coupled with the newly available reference genome sequence. However, further utilization of this valuable resource can be optimized by better understanding the promises and pitfalls of SNP arrays. We outline how best to analyze Brassica SNP marker array data for diverse applications, including linkage and association mapping, genetic diversity and genomic introgression studies. We present data on which SNPs are locus-specific in winter, semi-winter and spring B. napus germplasm pools, rather than amplifying both an A-genome and a C-genome locus or multiple loci. Common issues that arise when analyzing array data will be discussed, particularly those unique to SNP markers and how to deal with these for practical applications in Brassica breeding applications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 20% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 26% |
| Researcher | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 32 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,454,502
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#376
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,787
of 311,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#13
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.