You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
DDE: Interference with extra-renal salt excretion in the mallard
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 1973
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01856771 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Friend, M. A. Haegele, R. Wilson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 50% |
| Researcher | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2002.
All research outputs
#5,161,738
of 24,380,741 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#284
of 4,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#855
of 18,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,380,741 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them