↓ Skip to main content

Theoretical treatment of pulsed Overhauser dynamic nuclear polarization: Consideration of a general periodic pulse sequence

Overview of attention for article published in JETP Letters, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Theoretical treatment of pulsed Overhauser dynamic nuclear polarization: Consideration of a general periodic pulse sequence
Published in
JETP Letters, July 2016
DOI 10.1134/s0021364016090113
Authors

E. A. Nasibulov, A. S. Kiryutin, A. V. Yurkovskaya, H. -M. Vieth, K. L. Ivanov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 50%
Physics and Astronomy 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,986,962
of 23,730,866 outputs
Outputs from JETP Letters
#183
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,516
of 367,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JETP Letters
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,730,866 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.