| Title |
The UNC-CH MCH Leadership Training Consortium: Building the Capacity to Develop Interdisciplinary MCH Leaders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Maternal and Child Health Journal, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10995-009-0483-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janice Dodds, William Vann, Jessica Lee, Angela Rosenberg, Kathleen Rounds, Marcia Roth, Marlyn Wells, Emily Evens, Lewis H. Margolis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#839
of 2,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,221
of 114,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Maternal and Child Health Journal
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.