You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bacterial sulfur disproportionation constrains timing of Neoproterozoic oxygenation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geology, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1130/g38602.1 |
Authors |
Marcus Kunzmann, Thi Hao Bui, Peter W. Crockford, Galen P. Halverson, Clint Scott, Timothy W. Lyons, Boswell A. Wing |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Estonia | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 70 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 19 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 43 | 57% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2017.
All research outputs
#1,805,307
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Geology
#1,458
of 4,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,021
of 421,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geology
#47
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.